Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Australian state governments adopted strict border restrictions. In rural border communities, difficulties associated with government interventions were routinely conceptualized by rural peoples as a continuation of a theme of disenfranchisement derived from a rural−urban schism. This qualitative study, comprising semi-structured interviews ( N = 35) with participants from the town of Goondiwindi, Queensland (Australia), contributes to the literature on urban−rural divides. The findings demonstrate not only the continuation of a theme of rural dissatisfaction with city-based government, but an emergent “othering” of city-based compatriots resultant of experiences with state border restrictions. These findings have political implications and broader consequence for social cohesion between predominantly urban citizenry and the rural minority.
Kneipp et al. (Sat,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: