Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
I argue that literary studies can contribute to the “imagery debate” (between pictorialist, propositionalist, and enactivist accounts of mental imagery). While imagery questionnaires are pictorially configured and conflate imagining and seeing with pictorial representation, literary texts can exploit language's capacity for indeterminacy and therefore elicit very different imaginative experiences, thus illuminating the non-pictorial qualities of mental imagery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Emily T. Troscianko (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: