Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article examines connections between communication and identity. We present an analysis of actual, recorded social interactions in order to describe intersections between identity and vocabulary selection. We focus on how, in selecting or deselecting particular terms (e.g., cephalic, doula, cooker) speakers can display both their own identities and the identities of others. We show how these identities are constructed in part through speakers' selection and competent deployment of the specialist vocabularies associated with particular territories of expertise, how identities can be challenged when cointeractants presume understanding problems with specialist vocabularies, and how they can be defended (more or less vigorously) against such challenges with claims or displays of understanding. This conversation analytic approach to talk-in-interaction documents how specialist vocabularies can be deployed, in situ, in the construction of social identities. In describing how communication is used in the enactment and construction of identity, our findings contribute to the developing body of research specifying communication practices through which identity is constructed and showing how salient identities are made manifest in interaction. Keywords: Conversation AnalysisInterpersonal CommunicationIntersubjectivityLanguage and Social InteractionRecipient DesignRepairSpecialist Terms Acknowledgments The authors acknowledge helpful suggestions from Anita Pomerantz, John Heritage, Sue Wilkinson, the editor and two anonymous reviewers at Communication Monographs, and audiences at the annual conventions of the National Communication Association, 2008, and American Sociological Association, 2007, where earlier versions of this paper were presented. Additional informationNotes on contributorsCelia Kitzinger Celia Kitzinger is in the Department of Sociology at the University of York, UK Jenny Mandelbaum Jenny Mandelbaum is in the Department of Communication at Rutgers University, USA
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kitzinger et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: