Key result
Greater intra-fusiform FG3-FG1 coupling correlates with a higher concentration of depression.
Why the study?
Anxiety and depression co-occur, but the neural substrates underlying shared and unique components of these symptoms are not understood.
Are functional coupling differences during emotional processing associated with depressive relative to anxiety symptoms in adults with depression?
Cross-Sectional (n=43)
Are functional coupling differences during emotional processing associated with depressive relative to anxiety symptoms in adults with depression?
Intra-fusiform coupling is differentially associated with depressive versus anxiety symptoms during emotion perception, providing neural substrates that could inform future treatments.
Intra-fusiform coupling differences may distinguish depressive from anxiety symptoms; leaves open targeted interventions pending longitudinal studies.
Anxiety and depression co-occur; the neural substrates of shared and unique components of these symptoms are not understood. Given emotional alterations in internalizing disorders, we hypothesized that function of regions associated with emotion processing/regulation, including the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), amygdala and fusiform gyrus (FG), would differentiate these symptoms. Forty-three adults with depression completed an emotional functional magnetic resonance imaging task and the Hamilton Depression and Anxiety Scales. We transformed these scales to examine two orthogonal components, one representing internalizing symptom severity and the other the type of internalizing symptoms (anxiety vs depression). We extracted blood oxygen level dependent signal from FG subregions, ACC, and amygdala and performed generalized psychophysiological interaction analyses to assess relationships between symptoms and brain function. Type of internalizing symptoms was associated with FG3-FG1 coupling (F = 8.14, P = 0.007). More coupling was associated with a higher concentration of depression, demonstrating that intra-fusiform coupling is differentially associated with internalizing symptom type (anxiety vs depression). We found an interaction between task condition and internalizing symptoms and dorsal (F = 4.51, P = 0.014) and rostral ACC activity (F = 4.27, P = 0.012). Post hoc comparisons revealed that less activity was associated with greater symptom severity during emotional regulation. Functional coupling differences during emotional processing are associated with depressive relative to anxiety symptoms and internalizing symptom severity. These findings could inform future treatments for depression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edmiston et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Depression (n=43). Emotional functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) task was evaluated on Association between type of internalizing symptoms and FG3-FG1 coupling (p=0.007). Intra-fusiform (FG3-FG1) coupling was differentially associated with internalizing symptom type, with greater coupling linked to a higher concentration of depression (P=0.007).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: