This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Mereological nihilism is the view that all concrete objects are simple. Existence monism is the view that the only concrete object is one big simple: the world. I will argue that nihilism culminates in monism. The nihilist demands the simplest sufficient ontology, and the monist delivers it. Nothing is cheaper and commoner in philosophy than monism; what, unhappily, is still rare, is an attempt to defend it, and critically to establish its assumptions. [Schiller 1897 Schiller, F. C. S. 1897. Reply: Lotze's Monism. Philosophical Review, 6: 62–64. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]: 62]
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jonathan Schaffer (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: