PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 28, 2015PLoS ONE415 citationsOpen Access

Validity of (Ultra-)Short Recordings for Heart Rate Variability Measurements

MMM. Loretto MuñozARArie van RoonHRHarriëtte Riese

Structured PICO

Do (ultra-)short ECG recordings accurately measure time-domain heart rate variability compared to 240s-300s recordings in adults?

P
Population
3,387 adults
I
Intervention
(Ultra-)short ECG recordings of 10s(3x), 30s, and 120s
C
Comparator
240s-300s (gold standard) ECG measurements
O
Outcome
Agreement of standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) and root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) using Pearson's correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement and Cohen's d statisticssurrogate

Ultra-short ECG recordings of 10s to 120s can provide valid measurements of time-domain heart rate variability, particularly RMSSD, enabling large-scale epidemiological studies.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In order to investigate the applicability of routine 10s electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings for time-domain heart rate variability (HRV) calculation we explored to what extent these (ultra-)short recordings capture the "actual" HRV. METHODS: The standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN) and the root mean square of successive differences (RMSSD) were measured in 3,387 adults. SDNN and RMSSD were assessed from (ultra)short recordings of 10s(3x), 30s, and 120s and compared to 240s-300s (gold standard) measurements. Pearson's correlation coefficients (r), Bland-Altman 95% limits of agreement and Cohen's d statistics were used as agreement analysis techniques. RESULTS: Agreement between the separate 10s recordings and the 240s-300s recording was already substantial (r = 0.758-0.764/Bias = 0.398-0.416/d = 0.855-0.894 for SDNN; r = 0.853-0.862/Bias = 0.079-0.096/d = 0.150-0.171 for RMSSD), and improved further when three 10s periods were averaged (r = 0.863/Bias = 0.406/d = 0.874 for SDNN; r = 0.941/Bias = 0.088/d = 0.167 for RMSSD). Agreement increased with recording length and reached near perfect agreement at 120s (r = 0.956/Bias = 0.064/d = 0.137 for SDNN; r = 0.986/Bias = 0.014/d = 0.027 for RMSSD). For all recording lengths and agreement measures, RMSSD outperformed SDNN. CONCLUSIONS: Our results confirm that it is unnecessary to use recordings longer than 120s to obtain accurate measures of RMSSD and SDNN in the time domain. Even a single 10s (standard ECG) recording yields a valid RMSSD measurement, although an average over multiple 10s ECGs is preferable. For SDNN we would recommend either 30s or multiple 10s ECGs. Future research projects using time-domain HRV parameters, e.g. genetic epidemiological studies, could calculate HRV from (ultra-)short ECGs enabling such projects to be performed at a large scale.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Muñoz et al. (2015) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0a4b82df43cb70ca573c05https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0138921
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Both Decreased and Increased Heart Rate Variability on the Standard 10-Second Electrocardiogram Predict Cardiac Mortality in the Elderly: The Rotterdam Study1999 · 170 citations
  2. 2Heart Rate Variability from Short Electrocardiographic Recordings Predicts Mortality from All Causes in Middle-aged and Elderly Men: The Zutphen Study1997 · 505 citations
  3. 3Cardiac Autonomic Function and Incident Coronary Heart Disease: A Population-based Case-Cohort Study: The ARIC Study1997 · 339 citations
  4. 4Reliability of Ultra‐Short ECG Indices for Heart Rate Variability2011 · 253 citations
  5. 5Correlation of exercise capacity with high-sensitive C-reactive protein in patients with stable coronary artery disease2005 · 48 citations