Why the study?
PPG signals recorded by wearable devices are susceptible to motion artifacts that introduce errors into PRV extraction.
Does a combination of adaptive, spectrum, and nonlinear filtering improve the accuracy of pulse rate variability derived from wearable PPG devices compared to reference ECG?
Does a combination of adaptive, spectrum, and nonlinear filtering improve the accuracy of pulse rate variability derived from wearable PPG devices compared to reference ECG?
A combined filtering approach using spectrum, adaptive, and nonlinear methods significantly improves the accuracy of wearable-derived pulse rate variability during motion.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May enhance wearable PRV accuracy in daily motion; leaves open prospective ECG validation before clinical use.
• The aim is to analyze the filtering motion artifacts from PPG using the ACC signal. • The corrected PRVs were compared with reference HRV by calculating the RRMSE. • Filtering PPG signals with SF reduced the PRV error the most and NF the least. • In various laboratory experiments, similar results were achieved for SF + PP, SF + AF + PP, and NF + PP. • In signal affected by motion artifacts the SF + AF + NF + PP was the most beneficial. The popularity of wearable devices that record the photoplethysmographic (PPG) signal is increasing their use as monitors of circulatory and nervous systems function, including the extraction of pulse rate variability (PRV). Unfortunately, PPG is susceptible to interferences, including motion artifacts, which introduce errors into PRV. The aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of different approaches to filtering PPG (however, without recent deep learning methods) using an accelerometer (ACC) signal, in order to improve the accuracy of PRV extraction. This research concerns single and combined methods: adaptive filtering (AF) using the normalized least mean squares, spectrum filtering (SF) and nonlinear filtering (NF) using empirical mode decomposition. Filtering was complemented by postprocessing (PP): improving the accuracy of peak determination in PPG, correction of non-physiological values in PRV and its autoregressive modeling. The corrected PRVs were compared with reference heart rate variabilities (HRVs) extracted from the simultaneously recorded ECG by calculating the relative root mean square error (RRMSE). The results for different filtering sequences schemes indicate that filtering PPG signals with SF reduced the PRV error the most and NF the least. In various laboratory experiments, SF + PP, as well as SF + AF + NF + PP, resulted in the overall lower RRMSE, while in conditions similar to everyday life, the sequence of SF + AF + NF + PP proved to be the best sequence of methods (BS). The work shows that the use of the proposed BS of methods allows for improving the accuracy of PRV signal, increasing its similarity to the reference HRV for all types of analyzed experiments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prucnal et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: