PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
September 11, 2014The Journal of Pathology186 citationsOpen Access

Tissue tropism, pathology and pathogenesis of enterovirus infection

View Full Paper
AMAtis MuehlenbachsJBJulu BhatnagarSZSherif R. Zaki

Key Result

Diagnostic modalities for enterovirus infections provide insight into tissue tropism and pathogenesis but require clinical-pathological correlation due to assay non-specificity.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Patients with enterovirus infection
I
Intervention
Histopathological, immunohistochemical, and molecular diagnostic modalities
O
Outcome
Histopathological features and diagnostic accuracy/pitfalls

This review highlights the histopathological features of enterovirus infections and the utility and pitfalls of diagnostic modalities like immunohistochemistry and molecular methods on tissue specimens.

Limitations

  • Immunohistochemistry assays can be non-specific and detect other viruses
  • High frequency of asymptomatic enteroviral infections requires clinical-pathological correlation to determine significance
  • Diagnostic assays on central nervous system or cardiac tissues from immunocompetent patients with prolonged disease courses are most often negative

Abstract

Enteroviruses are very common and cause infections with a diverse array of clinical features. Enteroviruses are most frequently considered by practising pathologists in cases of aseptic meningitis, encephalitis, myocarditis and disseminated infections in neonates and infants. Congenital infections have been reported and transplacental transmission is thought to occur. Although skin biopsies during hand, foot and mouth disease are infrequently obtained, characteristic dermatopathological findings can be seen. Enteroviruses have been implicated in lower respiratory tract infections. This review highlights histopathological features of enterovirus infection and discusses diagnostic modalities for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues and their associated pitfalls. Immunohistochemistry can detect enterovirus antigen within cells of affected tissues; however, assays can be non-specific and detect other viruses. Molecular methods are increasingly relied upon but, due to the high frequency of asymptomatic enteroviral infections, clinical-pathological correlation is needed to determine significance. Of note, diagnostic assays on central nervous system or cardiac tissues from immunocompetent patients with prolonged disease courses are most often negative. Histopathological, immunohistochemical and molecular studies performed on clinical specimens also provide insight into enteroviral tissue tropism and pathogenesis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Muehlenbachs et al. (2014) conducted a review in Enterovirus infection. Diagnostic modalities was evaluated. Diagnostic modalities for enterovirus infections provide insight into tissue tropism and pathogenesis but require clinical-pathological correlation due to assay non-specificity.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0a589197b2cd65685916c4https://doi.org/10.1002/path.4438
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper