Key result
Idarucizumab before stroke thrombolysis is associated with similar symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage rates versus non-use.
Why the study?
To assess dabigatran reversal frequency and utilization trends with idarucizumab, and compare door-to-needle times, complications, and outcomes to patients not exposed to idarucizumab in thrombolyzed stroke patients.
Does idarucizumab prior to thrombolysis in stroke patients taking dabigatran result in similar safety and clinical outcomes compared to patients not exposed to idarucizumab?
Observational (n=1,336)
Yes
Does idarucizumab prior to thrombolysis in stroke patients taking dabigatran result in similar safety and clinical outcomes compared to patients not exposed to idarucizumab?
Idarucizumab appears safe and facilitates thrombolysis in stroke patients taking dabigatran, with similar early outcomes to routinely managed patients despite a delay in door-to-needle time.
May support idarucizumab before thrombolysis in dabigatran-treated stroke; leaves open randomized confirmation of safety and outcomes.
Objective To assess the frequency and utilization trends of dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab and compare associated complications, outcomes, and door-to-needle times to those of patients not exposed to idarucizumab in a nationwide cohort of thrombolyzed patients over a 24-month period. Methods This is an observational cohort study of all New Zealand patients with stroke treated with stroke reperfusion entered into a mandatory online national registry. Each hospital records data including patient demographics, treatment delays, complications, 7-day outcomes, and idarucizumab use. Results Between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2018, 1,336 patients received thrombolysis. Fifty-one patients received idarucizumab prior to thrombolysis (median [interquartile range] age 73 [57–83] years): 8 (1.3%) in 2017 and 43 (6%) in 2018 (p < 0.001). Over the same 24-month period, 386 patients had stroke clot retrieval, of whom 8 (2.1%) were first treated with idarucizumab. Idarucizumab-treated patients had slower door-to-needle times (83 [54–110] minutes vs 61 [43–85] minutes, p = 0.0006). Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage occurred in 2 (3.9%) of the idarucizumab-treated patients and 49 (3.8%) of the other thrombolyzed patients (p = 0.97). None of the idarucizumab-treated patients had significant thrombotic complications. At 7 days, 3 (5.9%) idarucizumab-treated and 101 (7.9%) of the other thrombolyzed patients had died (p = 0.61). Conclusion Idarucizumab was used in 6% of all thrombolyzed patients in a national cohort during 2018, up from 1.3% in 2017. Idarucizumab appeared to be safe with similar clinical outcomes to routinely managed patients, despite a 22-minute door-to-needle time delay. Idarucizumab can facilitate thrombolysis in patients with stroke taking dabigatran. Classification of evidence This study provides Class III evidence that idarucizumab use is associated with similar early post-thrombolysis outcomes compared with patients not exposed to this drug.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barber et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Stroke (n=1,336). Idarucizumab vs. No idarucizumab was evaluated on Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (p=0.97). Idarucizumab use prior to thrombolysis in stroke patients was associated with similar rates of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (3.9% vs 3.8%, p=0.97) compared to non-exposed patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: