Why the study?
Does concomitant coronary artery disease and combined CABG reduce postoperative myocardial recovery in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis?
Does concomitant coronary artery disease and combined CABG reduce postoperative myocardial recovery in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis?
Concomitant coronary artery disease requiring CABG during aortic valve replacement is associated with blunted left ventricular mass regression and a lack of ejection fraction improvement compared to isolated AVR.
May indicate poorer LV recovery with concomitant CABG; leaves open whether CAD or bypass itself limits regression.
Left ventricular dimensions tend to reduce after aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic stenosis. Whether concomitant coronary artery disease has an influence on postoperative ventricular dimensions has not been evaluated. Between 1998 and 2002, 112 patients underwent aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis; 68 had isolated aortic valve replacement, and 44 had combined coronary artery bypass grafting. Left ventricular dimensions were assessed by echocardiography preoperatively and at 3 and 12 months postoperatively. Transvalvular mean gradient, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, and left ventricular mass index decreased significantly postoperatively, while left ventricular ejection fraction improved. Preoperative left ventricular dimensions in patients with isolated aortic stenosis were worse than in those with aortic stenosis and coronary artery disease. After aortic valve replacement with coronary artery bypass, left ventricular mass index regression was less than that after valve replacement alone, and there was no improvement in ejection fraction. This suggests that coronary artery disease has a negative impact on postoperative myocardial recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grünenfelder et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: