AIM: To assess the impact of orthokeratology on myopia progression, exotropia conditions and visual function in children with myopia and intermittent exotropia. METHODS: This prospective cohort study recruited children aged 8-13 years with myopia and intermittent exotropia who chose to wear either orthokeratology lenses or single-vision spectacles. Participants underwent ocular assessments every 3 months over 1 year. Generalized estimating equations was employed to account for inter-eye correlation. RESULTS: Orthokeratology group had slower axial elongation than single-vision spectacle group at 1 year (0.24 mm vs. 0.40 mm; difference = -0.17, 95% CI: -0.25, -0.09; P < 0.001). In the orthokeratology vs. spectacle group, respectively, the mean change was -5.03 prism diopters (PD) vs. 1.77 PD (difference = -6.81, 95% CI: -9.38, -4.23; P < 0.001) in distant exodeviation, -4.11 PD vs. 0.39 PD (difference = -4.50, 95% CI: -8.28, -0.72; P = 0.02) in near exodeviation, -0.28 vs. 0.22 (difference = -0.49, 95% CI: -1.00, 0.02; P = 0.06) in distant exotropia control, and -0.25 vs. 0.26 (difference = -0.51, 95% CI: -0.98, -0.05; P = 0.03) in near exotropia control at 1 year. Improved accommodative functions were observed in the orthokeratology group at 1 year, including monocular accommodative facility (P = 0.004), negative relative accommodation (P = 0.02), and positive relative accommodation (P = 0.02). No serious adverse effect was observed throughout the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: In children with myopia and intermittent exotropia, orthokeratology may be recommended for its efficacy in controlling myopia progression, and for its potential to improve or maintain exotropia conditions.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: