PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 18, 2026Photodiagnosis and Photodynamic Therapy0 citationsOpen Access

Orthokeratology in Children with Myopia and Intermittent Exotropia: the Nanjing Strabismus Cohort

View Full Paper
TLTianxi LiXZXiaoxia ZuoHTHanyang Tang

Key Points

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of orthokeratology on myopia progression and visual function in children with intermittent exotropia.
  • Prospective cohort study involving children aged 8-13 years with myopia and intermittent exotropia.
  • Participants wore either orthokeratology lenses or single-vision spectacles, with assessments every 3 months over 1 year.
  • Generalized estimating equations were used to analyze data considering inter-eye correlation.
  • Orthokeratology group showed slower axial elongation (0.24 mm) compared to spectacle group (0.40 mm); P < 0.001.
  • Distant exodeviation decreased by -5.03 PD in orthokeratology compared to 1.77 PD in spectacles (difference -6.81; P < 0.001).
  • Near exodeviation change was -4.11 PD for orthokeratology vs. 0.39 PD for spectacles (difference -4.50; P = 0.02).

Abstract

AIM: To assess the impact of orthokeratology on myopia progression, exotropia conditions and visual function in children with myopia and intermittent exotropia. METHODS: This prospective cohort study recruited children aged 8-13 years with myopia and intermittent exotropia who chose to wear either orthokeratology lenses or single-vision spectacles. Participants underwent ocular assessments every 3 months over 1 year. Generalized estimating equations was employed to account for inter-eye correlation. RESULTS: Orthokeratology group had slower axial elongation than single-vision spectacle group at 1 year (0.24 mm vs. 0.40 mm; difference = -0.17, 95% CI: -0.25, -0.09; P < 0.001). In the orthokeratology vs. spectacle group, respectively, the mean change was -5.03 prism diopters (PD) vs. 1.77 PD (difference = -6.81, 95% CI: -9.38, -4.23; P < 0.001) in distant exodeviation, -4.11 PD vs. 0.39 PD (difference = -4.50, 95% CI: -8.28, -0.72; P = 0.02) in near exodeviation, -0.28 vs. 0.22 (difference = -0.49, 95% CI: -1.00, 0.02; P = 0.06) in distant exotropia control, and -0.25 vs. 0.26 (difference = -0.51, 95% CI: -0.98, -0.05; P = 0.03) in near exotropia control at 1 year. Improved accommodative functions were observed in the orthokeratology group at 1 year, including monocular accommodative facility (P = 0.004), negative relative accommodation (P = 0.02), and positive relative accommodation (P = 0.02). No serious adverse effect was observed throughout the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: In children with myopia and intermittent exotropia, orthokeratology may be recommended for its efficacy in controlling myopia progression, and for its potential to improve or maintain exotropia conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0aabc25ba8ef6d83b6f758https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2026.105511
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Prevalence, incidence and risk factors of strabismus in a Chinese population-based cohort of preschool children: the Nanjing Eye Study2020 · 33 citations
  2. 2An Office-Based Scale for Assessing Control in Intermittent Exotropia2006 · 177 citations
  3. 3The Development of Myopia Among Children With Intermittent Exotropia2010 · 81 citations
  4. 4One‐year results of the Variation of Orthokeratology Lens Treatment Zone (VOLTZ) Study: a prospective randomised clinical trial2021 · 121 citations
  5. 5The relationship between accommodative and binocular function with myopia progression in myopic children undergoing orthokeratology2024 · 7 citations