PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 18, 2026Physics in Medicine and Biology1 citationsOpen Access

Protocol optimization for MRI studies in radiation oncology: I. phantoms

View Full Paper
YDYves De DeeneMWMorgan J WheatleyRRRobba Rai

Key Points

  • The aim is to optimize MRI protocols for radiation oncology using in-house-built phantoms to enhance reliability.
  • Developed in-house-built phantoms for MRI protocol testing.
  • Assessed inconsistencies in image processing and analysis across centers.
  • Implemented advanced pulse sequence optimization and quality assurance procedures.
  • Enhanced reliability of quantitative MRI measurements through improved pulse sequence optimization.
  • Reduction of bias due to improved harmonization of protocols and QA measures.
  • Demonstrated the effectiveness of phantoms in minimizing uncertainties in imaging.

Abstract

MRI plays an increasing role at different stages in the radiation oncology workflow, including tumor detection and delineation, the prediction of margins, fiducial marker detection, the estimation of organ and tumor motion, biofunctional avoidance and treatment response assessment using quantitative imaging biomarkers. Where conventional anatomical contrast-weighted MRI scans are a first-line strategy used for tumor detection and delineation, quantitative biofunctional MRI can provide predictors of tumor response or regional information on functional organs at risk.Unfortunately, the implementation of advanced quantitative MRI (qMRI) techniques is prone to bias and uncertainties as a result of an over-reliance on vendor provided pulse sequences, image processing and analysis methods that have not been designed in the light of imaging biomarkers for radiotherapy guidance.Bias in quantitative MRI measurements can originate from the implementation of oversimplified physical models, unrecognized image artefacts and poor parametric fitting methods. Moreover, inconsistency in the use of imaging parameters and image post-processing methods across different centers results in a large variability in reported quantitative parameters. Much bias slips under the radar of both the medical physicist and MRI technologists because of the intrinsic variability between different human subjects which may remain undetected even when the imaging protocol is optimized with commercial quality assurance (QA) phantoms. Adequate pulse sequence optimization, harmonization of protocols and QA is essential to safeguard the reliability and robustness of the MRI protocols and can provide objective measures of uncertainty in quantitative parametric MRI maps. The increasing introduction of compressed sensing and data driven approaches in MRI image reconstruction demands for a different approach in imaging QA. In this first part, in-house-built phantoms are discussed that have proven useful in the optimization and QA of MRI sequences, protocols and post-processing methods.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Deene et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0aabf55ba8ef6d83b6f8cfhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ae6eb1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper