Study classifies explosive molecules using electrostatic potential images, highlighting machine learning effectiveness.
Identifying explosive molecules is crucial for safety and materials research. In this work, we propose a machine learning framework for classifying 119 molecules using images of their electrostatic potential maps (MEPs), computed from quantum-chemical methods and depicting the molecules' positive and negative electric charge regions. The training dataset was augmented by rotating each image 30 times, and a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) was subsequently trained to classify molecules. The CNN classification model was combined with advanced gradient-based Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) techniques and visualization methods. The CNN achieved 100% accuracy on the test set, demonstrating its effectiveness. In a separate experiment, it achieved a 81.25% accuracy using molecules chemically distinct from the training set: the CNN model classified eight as explosive, including two known simulants and two non-explosive compounds containing strong electron-withdrawing groups, thus indicating sensitivity to chemically relevant features not included in the training distribution. To gain a deeper understanding of the model’s decision-making process, we used the Saliency Map technique with the reduce_max function to identify the most critical regions in the MEP images for the classification task. Neutral and homogeneous MEP regions primarily characterize non-explosive molecules . In contrast, explosive compounds are associated with pronounced electrostatic potential gradients and localized charge features , particularly in regions related to nitro groups and trigger bonds. This work highlights the potential of combining MEPs computed from quantum-chemical methods with machine learning to analyze and classify molecules with targeted properties.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Souza et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: