Demonstrates effective diol production in waste PET, implying efficient recycling methods.
The catalytic upcycling of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) into monomer-grade diols with controlled stereochemistry remains challenging because of polymer inertness, limited stereocontrol in downstream hydrogenation, and the reliance on precious-metal catalysts under forcing conditions. Here, we report a relay hydrogenation-hydrogenolysis strategy enabled by interface-designed base-metal catalysts for the one-pot conversion of PET into 1,4-cyclohexanedimethanol (CHDM) with a trans-enriched stereochemical profile. An inverse ZrO2/Ni catalyst efficiently promotes aromatic-ring hydrogenation by enhancing H2 activation while moderating aromatic adsorption, achieving near-complete hydrogenation of PET under mild conditions. Subsequently, a m-ZnO/Cu catalyst selectively facilitates ester hydrogenolysis, affording CHDM in yields up to ∼86% with trans/cis ratio exceeding 3.60 in the one-pot system. Mechanistic studies reveal that CHDM stereoselectivity does not originate from ester bond cleavage itself but emerges from stage-dependent catalytic regulation and is strongly influenced by the evolving reaction environment, particularly ethylene glycol generated in situ during hydrogenolysis. Validation using real post-consumer PET feedstocks—including bottles, films, food containers, and mulch films—demonstrates consistently high CHDM yields (73−79%) with trans-enriched stereochemistry. Catalyst-recycling experiments confirm stable performance over multiple cycles after appropriate regeneration. Furthermore, techno-economic and life cycle assessments indicate that this PET upcycling route reduces the carbon footprint of CHDM production by approximately 3.6-fold compared with conventional naphtha-based processes. This work establishes interface-designed base-metal catalysis as a viable platform for the stereochemically controlled and responsible upcycling of waste polyesters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: