Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review reports outcomes of femoropopliteal surgical bypass, suggesting implications for decision-making in treatment.
OBJECTIVE: While endovascular therapy is increasingly used for femoropopliteal disease, surgical bypass remains an alternative for long-segment or heavily calcified lesions. However, contemporary outcomes for non-autologous conduits are not well-established. This systematic review and meta-analysis provides a modern benchmark for outcomes associated with above-the-knee (ATK) femoropopliteal prosthetic bypass. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted, leveraging a previously published search strategy while adopting a broader patient population, and inclusive of relevant records published through January 2023. Included studies reported a minimum of one-year follow-up of primary or secondary patency, mortality, or limb salvage, for patients who underwent femoropopliteal ATK revascularization via non-autologous surgical bypass. Risk of bias and quality of evidence assessments were conducted for each study and outcome. A pooled meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model for all outcomes at 6-, 12-, 24- and 36-months based on available reporting. Extensive subgroup analyses were conducted for 12-month outcomes, including stratification of records by type of prosthetic conduit, outcome definition, period of data collection, disease severity, underlying bias, and study design. RESULTS: The final sample included N=16 records reporting on a total of 2,083 patients and 2,118 limbs. The pooled 6-, 12-, 24-, and 36-month overall event rates [95% CI] were as follows: 0.88 [0.85, 0.90], 0.80 [0.77, 0.82], 0.69 [0.65, 0.72], and 0.61 [0.57, 0.65] for primary patency; 0.92 [0.88, 0.95], 0.86 [0.82, 0.89], 0.79 [0.71, 0.84], and 0.68 [0.56, 0.78] for secondary patency; and 0.07 [0.02, 0.14], 0.09 [0.06, 0.13], 0.13 [0.10, 0.17], and 0.24 [0.13, 0.40] for mortality, respectively. Based on data available, only 12- and 24-month pooled estimates were derived for limb salvage, with resulting event rates of 0.97 [0.91, 1.00] and 0.98 [0.66, 1.00]. Primary patency was generally more favorable for records adopting a Society for Vascular Surgery-oriented definition of primary patency, meaning freedom from flow-restoring or maintenance interventions. The 12-month pooled estimates for subgroup analyses stratified by type of prosthetic conduit were comparable for PTFE and Dacron across all outcomes. Additional details of subgroup analyses explored are discussed. CONCLUSIONS: The current analysis provides comprehensive perspective on contemporary outcomes of non-autologous ATK femoropopliteal surgical bypass. In the management of long femoral-popliteal lesions in patients lacking suitable greater saphenous vein conduit, the anticipated results of an endovascular approach must be compared to those included herein for prosthetic femoral-popliteal bypass. These data, with reporting of up to 36 months follow-up, should be weighed for treatment decision making. FUNDING: This work was supported by Endologix Inc., Irvine, CA, United States.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ryschon et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: