Quantifies clinical, economic, and environmental impacts of SGLT-2i access in CKD patients, suggesting broad eligibility improves outcomes.
Introduction: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects more than 10% of the United Kingdom (UK) population and is expected to rise.Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) are effective at slowing CKD progression; however, they are under prescribed due to barriers including the need for urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) testing and lack of guideline alignment.This study sought to quantify the clinical, economic, and environmental trade-offs of broad and restrictive SGLT-2i access in the UK. Methods:Five scenarios exploring a range of SGLT-2i eligibility criteria for patients with CKD were modelled over 10 years, beginning from 2025, using the validated IMPACT CKD individual-level microsimulation model.SGLT-2i treatment was modelled to improve estimated glomerular filtration rate decline and reduce cardiovascular events and acute kidney injury.A 3.5% per annum discount was applied to economic outcomes. Results:A maximally inclusive SGLT-2i scenario was compared to each of the less inclusive SGLT-2i eligibility criteria scenarios.Increasingly restrictive scenarios are projected to increase dialysis and allcause mortality by 4.0%-17.2%and 1.3%-4.3%,respectively.Resulting from higher mortality, CKD prevalence is projected to decrease by 0.5%-1.4%.Non-kidney replacement therapy (KRT) CKD costs and KRT costs are projected to increase by 0.7%-2.1% and 2.4%-10.6%,respectively with increasingly restrictive scenarios.Total costs are projected to decrease by 15.2%-33.9%as fewer patients are treated.Due to shifts to later stages, KRT-related environmental burden is projected to increase by 3.1%-14.9%. Conclusion:Broad SGLT-2i eligibility criteria would likely reduce the holistic burden of CKD for patients, the National Health Service, and the environment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tangri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: