Compares kernel functions and layouts for impact simulation accuracy and efficiency.
A variance-based fixed-smoothing-scale SPH protocol with h = 2 σ and kernel-dependent support H = κ h is implemented in OpenRadioss to decouple kernel/layout effects from resolution. Four kernels (CS, W2, W4, W6) and two ordered layouts (SC, FCC) are compared at equal per-particle volume/mass on two benchmarks: Taylor impact in 4340 steel with pure SPH and spherical projectile perforation of an AA2024-T3 plate with FE–SPH coupling. The investigated smoothing-scale/particle spacing ratios are in range h / d = 1 . 10 –2.74. Accuracy is assessed using residual bar length and cap diameter and residual projectile velocity, together with wall-clock runtime. For Taylor impact, errors are typically minimized at intermediate smoothing scale, where the numerical results are close to reference experimental data (between 1% and 10% depending on the quantity of interest); the smallest h can exhibit free-surface neighbor deficiency and tensile-instability-driven particle ejection, while the largest h over-smooths cap geometry. Errors generally decrease with kernel smoothness, and FCC often outperforms SC at fixed h . For plate impact, residual velocity is governed primarily by parameter h , with larger h yielding smoother deceleration, lower plateau velocities, and reduced kernel sensitivity. Runtime is jointly affected by the choice of kernel and smoothing scale h . The fixed- h protocol establishes a common-resolution framework for cross-kernel comparison andprovides a transferable baseline for balancing accuracy, stability, and cost in explicit SPH impact simulations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: