PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 18, 2026Computational Particle Mechanics1 citationsOpen Access

Fixed-smoothing-scale SPH for high-velocity impact: Kernel function, particle layout, and the accuracy–cost trade-off

View Full Paper
HLHongchuan LiTHThibaut HirschlerSRSébastien Roth

Key Points

  • This research aims to establish an effective fixed-smoothing-scale protocol for SPH impact simulations.
  • Implemented a fixed-smoothing-scale SPH protocol in OpenRadioss.
  • Compared four kernels and two layouts at equal per-particle volume/mass across two impact benchmarks.
  • Assessed accuracy and runtime using various error metrics and particle spacing ratios.
  • Errors in Taylor impact minimized at intermediate smoothing scales, with accuracy within 1%-10% of experimental data.
  • Larger smoothing scales resulted in smoother deceleration and reduced velocity sensitivity in plate impacts.
  • Runtime was influenced by kernel choice and smoothing scale, underlining the trade-off between accuracy and computational cost.

Abstract

A variance-based fixed-smoothing-scale SPH protocol with h = 2 σ and kernel-dependent support H = κ h is implemented in OpenRadioss to decouple kernel/layout effects from resolution. Four kernels (CS, W2, W4, W6) and two ordered layouts (SC, FCC) are compared at equal per-particle volume/mass on two benchmarks: Taylor impact in 4340 steel with pure SPH and spherical projectile perforation of an AA2024-T3 plate with FE–SPH coupling. The investigated smoothing-scale/particle spacing ratios are in range h / d = 1 . 10 –2.74. Accuracy is assessed using residual bar length and cap diameter and residual projectile velocity, together with wall-clock runtime. For Taylor impact, errors are typically minimized at intermediate smoothing scale, where the numerical results are close to reference experimental data (between 1% and 10% depending on the quantity of interest); the smallest h can exhibit free-surface neighbor deficiency and tensile-instability-driven particle ejection, while the largest h over-smooths cap geometry. Errors generally decrease with kernel smoothness, and FCC often outperforms SC at fixed h . For plate impact, residual velocity is governed primarily by parameter h , with larger h yielding smoother deceleration, lower plateau velocities, and reduced kernel sensitivity. Runtime is jointly affected by the choice of kernel and smoothing scale h . The fixed- h protocol establishes a common-resolution framework for cross-kernel comparison andprovides a transferable baseline for balancing accuracy, stability, and cost in explicit SPH impact simulations.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0aac6d5ba8ef6d83b6fcd9https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpms.2026.04.006
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper