PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 18, 2026Scientific Reports0 citationsOpen Access

Subchronic toxicity of 222 nm ultraviolet irradiation in rats for safe human translation and application guidelines

JLJin LiYSYuxin SuCXChun Xu

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the long-term safety and potential adverse effects of 222 nm far-ultraviolet light exposure in a rat model.
  • Conducted a 90-day toxicological study on rats with graded doses of 222 nm light (5000, 1000, and 500 mJ/cm2/day).
  • Analyzed clinical symptoms, weight, hematological, biochemical, and histopathological indicators to assess toxicity.
  • Established a No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) for subchronic exposure.
  • High-dose group (5000 mJ/cm2/day) showed significant adverse effects such as skin damage and systemic weight loss.
  • Medium (1000 mJ/cm2/day) and low-dose (500 mJ/cm2/day) groups exhibited no abnormal clinical symptoms or behavioral changes.
  • A NOAEL of 1000 mJ/cm2/day was established, indicating safe continuous exposure at this level.

Abstract

This study investigated the long-term safety of 222 nm far-ultraviolet light, a promising technology for continuous disinfection that is believed to be safe for human exposure. To address concerns about its practical efficacy and potential long-term effects, an accelerated 90-day toxicological study was conducted on rats. The animals were exposed to graded doses of 222 nm light: high (5000 mJ/cm2/day), medium (1000 mJ/cm2/day), and low (500 mJ/cm2/day). The results were dose-dependent. The high-dose group exhibited significant adverse effects, including skin damage (inflammatory cell infiltration, thickening), systemic weight loss, and thymic atrophy. In stark contrast, the low and medium-dose groups showed no abnormal clinical symptoms, behavioral changes, or weight abnormalities throughout the entire study. Comprehensive analysis of hematological, biochemical, and histopathological indicators confirmed no toxicologically relevant changes at these lower doses. Based on these findings, the study established a No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) of 1000 mJ/cm2/day for subchronic exposure in rats. This indicates that continuous exposure to 222 nm far-UV light at or below this dose level is not associated with any detectable adverse biological effects, supporting its potential for safe use in occupied spaces.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0aac6d5ba8ef6d83b6fdd2https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-52872-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Chronic Far-UVC (222nm) Light Exposure of SKH-1 Hairless Mice Does Not Cause Detectable Eye Pathology or Visual Deficits2025 · 2 citations
  2. 2Interventional human ocular safety experiments for 222‐nm far‐ultraviolet‐C lamp irradiation2024 · 16 citations
  3. 3Extending the Acute Skin Response Spectrum to Include the Far-UVC2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4Antimicrobial effect and safety of 228 nm far-UVC light-emitting diodes2026
  5. 5Investigation of 222‐nm ultraviolet C irradiation bactericidal effect on the surgical field in a rabbit model2025