Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Longitudinal cohort study finds appointment bundling improves adherence in adolescents and young adults with kidney disease, indicating potential for better care access.
To identify patient-, health-, and visit-level factors associated with medical appointment adherence (MAA) among adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with pediatric-onset chronic kidney conditions, and to assess whether multiple pre-scheduled appointments on the same day (“bundling”) and preceding disease severity influence attendance and disparities. Retrospective longitudinal cohort study using electronic medical record data from a single academic children’s hospital (2005–2015). AYAs (n=353) with chronic kidney disease or systemic illnesses affecting the kidney had 37,371 scheduled outpatient appointments. The outcome was MAA (completed, cancelled, no-show). Covariates included demographics (e.g., age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance), disease characteristics (e.g., recent eGFR, transplant status), and appointment features (e.g., time since last visit, clinic type, weather). Multinomial logit models with patient-level clustering were estimated, stratified by disease severity and by single vs multiple appointments per day. No-show rates were higher among African American patients and those with Medicaid or self-pay insurance. Older age was also associated with lower adherence. On days with multiple scheduled appointments, overall attendance improved and insurance-related disparities were attenuated; among Medicaid patients, no-show differences observed on single-appointment days were reduced on bundled days. Findings were directionally consistent across disease-severity strata. Having ≥2 scheduled appointments on the same day is associated with improved attendance and reduced disparities in AYAs with chronic kidney conditions. Health-system strategies that facilitate appointment bundling (e.g., co-locating services and coordinated scheduling) could be a pragmatic quality-improvement target to improve equity and continuity of care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gilleskie et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: