Objectives Problems with healthcare provision in general practice are already present and expected to worsen in the future. Therefore, retaining medical professionals in the long-term. An important factor in deciding on a profession is its compatibility with one’s own life. This study aimed to examine general practitioners’ working environment, social environment, their current work-life integration and potential changes enabled by interprofessional working concepts. Design A qualitative approach was used, with guided focus group interviews with 37 general practitioners followed by individual interviews with 10 general practitioners. The interviews were verbatim transcribed and analysed using the framework method. The primary analyses were conducted, overall and separately for each gender. A professional group also carried out analyses. The subgroup analyses are based purely on qualitative trends. Results Both genders and all professional groups perceived work-life integration as necessary. Men tended to report a better work-life integration than women. Women were more likely to work part-time and emphasised difficulties with childcare. When establishing interprofessional concepts, participants hope for more opportunities for delegation and co-determination, which can go hand in hand with reduced workload. Conclusions In this current study, women tended to perceive a greater degree of double burden both in their job and leisure time than men did. Beyond these gender and professional group differences, there were also tendencies towards differences between women with and without children. The findings indicate that work-life integration is an important factor in the professional setting of general practice. Particularly given the increasing number of female general practitioners, the establishment of part-time and childcare options is necessary.
Trompke et al. (Fri,) studied this question.