ABSTRACT Outbreaks of vibriosis caused by Vibrio anguillarum are a persistent constraint on rainbow trout ( Oncorhynchus mykiss ) aquaculture. However, information on the population structure of field strains in Turkey has been lacking. Here, we report the first systematic serotypic, proteomic, and genomic characterization of 23 V. anguillarum isolates collected over 10 years from rainbow trout farms located in six major aquaculture regions of Turkey. Serological analyses based on microagglutination, supported by ELISA characterization of hyperimmune sera, identified a clear predominance of serotype O1, whereas isolate V12 exhibited a non‐agglutinating, atypical O‐antigen profile. Protein profiling (SDS‐PAGE) and immunoblotting showed largely conserved whole‐cell protein patterns among the isolates, but distinct immunogenic bands at 14, 18, and 40 kDa were detected in isolates V18 and V21. Long‐read whole‐genome sequencing revealed that most Turkish isolates grouped within the global O1 clade, while V12, V25, and V28 isolates occupied more distant branches. Comparative genomics demonstrated a conserved core virulence gene set (RTX toxins, siderophore and iron‐uptake systems, motility and adhesion factors, Type VI secretion system), with strain‐dependent variation in accessory loci such as anguibactin and T6SS‐I. Experimental infections of rainbow trout demonstrated significant differences in virulence among isolates ( p < 0.05), with the V18 isolate showing high, the V15 intermediate, and the V12 low‐mortality rates. By elucidating the relationship among the serotype, immunogenic protein profiles, virulence gene repertoires, and in vivo pathogenicity, this study provides a comprehensive overview of the antigenic and genomic diversity of Vibrio anguillarum isolates from Turkey. Notably, the identification of V18 and V21 as promising candidate strains for further vaccine evaluation, characterized by high virulence and unique immunogenic features, provides a scientific foundation for the development of serotype‐specific vaccination strategies to mitigate vibriosis‐associated losses in aquaculture.
Altun et al. (Fri,) studied this question.