Investigates crystal structures and magnetic behaviors of metal ion complexes, revealing structural and magnetic distinctions.
The crystal structures and magnetic properties of coordination complexes [Cu(C 6 H 5 O 4 ) 2 ] ( 1 ) and [Co(C 6 H 5 O 4 ) 2 ] ( 2 ) constructed from kojic acid were investigated. Single‐crystal X‐ray analyses revealed that both complexes formed one‐dimensional coordination polymers; however, their chain‐connectivity patterns differed owing to the distinct coordination environments of Cu(II) and Co(II). Complex 1 adopted a square‐pyramidal geometry arising from Jahn–Teller elongation, whereas complex 2 featured an octahedral Co(II) center, generating a structurally different polymeric network. Magnetic susceptibility measurements showed paramagnetic behaviors for both complexes without any magnetic phase transition above 2 K. Molecular‐orbital calculations demonstrated that the unpaired electron in 1 was strongly localized in the equatorial CuO plane, resulting in negligible spin density along the axial direction. Although a relatively short intermolecular Cu•••O contact (2.82 Å) with a sizable McConnell spin‐density product (∼0.13) was present, the poor orbital overlap along the axial direction suppressed superexchange, yielding essentially no magnetic coupling. In contrast, 2 contained Co–O•••H–O–Co hydrogen‐bond pathways, but the corresponding McConnell products (∼4 × 10 −3 ) are far below the threshold required for appreciable magnetic exchange. Therefore, the magnetic behavior of 2 is dominated by single‐ion effects, including multiplet splitting and zero‐field splitting, rather than by intermolecular superexchange.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fujita et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: