Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Research proposal introduces the Relational Encoding Index for assessing structural coherence in AI systems, suggesting potential for improved operational reliability.
The deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) as persistent autonomous agents introducesa class of operational failure — relational coordination failure — that is not adequatelycaptured by existing output-probability or post-generation monitoring approaches. Wepropose the Relational Encoding Index (REI), a runtime structural observability metricderived from graph-theoretic analysis of transformer attention topology.We first establish a precise failure taxonomy distinguishing (i) relational coordinationfailure, arising from breakdown of attention-mediated context integration, from (ii) factualretrieval failure, arising from MLP-layer knowledge retrieval — and restrict the scope of REIclaims to failure mode (i). Within this scope, REI operationalises the integration–segregationbalance of the inference graph using three established network-science measures: globalefficiency (Eglob ), modularity (Q), and participation entropy (HPC).We present the metric’s formal derivation, prove that it satisfies four stated design con-straints — monotonicity, numerical stability, non-negativity, and bounded range — as formalpropositions with analytic proofs, and characterise its information-theoretic interpretation.We introduce a sink-masking protocol to address the confounding effect of attention-sinktokens on graph topology, and establish a precise temporal model for runtime deployment.We present a formula sanity check under synthetic conditions and identify a six-priorityempirical validation programme including a mandatory baseline comparison.This paper is positioned as a research proposal and theoretical framework. All operationalthreshold values are theoretical placeholders requiring empirical calibration; production-gradereliability claims require the validation programme described herein.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
RUSSELL BROWN (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: