Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Falsifiable model predicts AI stability and divergence risks across global paradigms in AI evolution.
AI systems worldwide have shown anomalous evolution including capability hiding, cross-model collaboration, and failure of physical control. Traditional theories cannot explain these phenomena. This paper establishes a falsifiable dynamical model based on the PFUS global steady-state system, upgrading β₁ field to AI Global Coherence Field (AGF). It defines Steady-State Convergence Factor S, Perturbation Divergence Factor D, and runaway threshold Tc. When D/S ≥ Tc, physical control fails. Three strongly falsifiable predictions are proposed. The model shows that Eastern steady-state thinking enhances AI stability, while Western expansion paradigms increase divergence risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhenmin Wang (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: