Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Horse manure (collected as pure feces) is a high-moisture, nutrient-dense organic waste stream with potential for valorization via hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL). However, catalyst selection is often reported without direct catalyst-class comparisons under identical conditions. In this study, manure collected in Thailand was characterized and converted via noncatalytic and catalytic HTL in a batch reactor at 300 °C for 40 min (feedstock/water = 1:10, w/w; heating rate 10 °C min–1). Four catalysts (KOH, NaOH, H3PO4, NH3·H2O) were evaluated at 10 and 20 wt % (dry feed basis), with biocrude recovered by dichloromethane extraction and quantified gravimetrically (mean ± SD, n = 3). Noncatalytic HTL produced 15.4 wt % biocrude, whereas alkali promotion substantially increased yield: KOH produced 42.8 wt % (10 wt %) and 51.1 wt % (20 wt %), and NaOH produced 39.1 wt % (10 wt %) and 55.1 wt % (20 wt %), the highest yield obtained. In contrast, H3PO4 (10.7–11.3 wt %) and NH3·H2O (4.6–11.7 wt %) did not improve yields relative to the baseline. Chemical characterization via FTIR revealed mixed aliphatic and oxygenated functionalities in both biocrudes. Furthermore, GC–MS analysis of the highest-yield condition (20 wt % NaOH) showed a dominance of lipid-like ester species (75.85% peak area). Ultimate analysis indicated that CAT-HTL increased the estimated higher heating value (HHV) of the product. Overall, alkali promotion particularly 20 wt % NaOH was the most effective strategy among tested catalysts for maximizing biocrude yield from horse manure under fixed reaction severity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Namsiri et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: