Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates remineralization and antimicrobial effects of Sn-CPP-ACFP in dental treatments, suggesting enhanced efficacy.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the remineralisation and antimicrobial bioactivities of a novel Sn-CPP-ACFP nanocomplex. METHODS: (SF) or Sn-CPP-ACFP (CPPSF) for one min, four times a day, for 14 days. Post-treatment saliva samples were collected and analysed for bioavailable ions. At the end of each treatment period, the enamel and dentine blocks were removed and compared to untreated controls. The blocks were assessed for percent surface microhardness recovery (%SMHR) and remineralisation by transverse microradiography. The antimicrobial activity of Sn-CPP-ACFP was measured using Porphyromonas gingivalis (Pg) and Streptococcus mutans (Sm) with an agar diffusion assay. RESULTS: CPPSF was superior in inhibiting growth of Pg at pH 7.0 and Sm at pH 7.0 and pH 5.5 which correlated with the CPP's ability to solubilise and stabilise Sn ions. Furthermore, CPPSF (35.9 ± 1.5%) produced significantly (p < 0.001) higher remineralisation than SF (15.9 ± 1.1%) in enamel and in dentine (CPPSF 37.9 ± 2.5%; SF 21.9 ± 2.3%). Similar findings were observed for the %SMHR measurements with CPPSF 38.2 ± 8.7% and SF 4.7 ± 3.0%. Post-rinse saliva analysis revealed significantly higher Ca and Sn ion levels in saliva after CPPSF compared with SF. SEM analysis showed that CPPSF was more efficient than SF at occluding dentine tubules. SIGNIFICANCE: The novel Sn-CPP-ACFP nanocomplex enhanced remineralisation and antimicrobial efficacy compared with SF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: