PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 18, 2026AI in Precision Oncology0 citations

Deeper Learning, Human–Machine Interactions and Lessons Learned from the Early Adoption of Artificial Intelligence in Gastroenterology

View Full Paper
HFHannah FarfourTKToufic Kachaamy

Key Points

  • This review aims to explore the early adoption of AI in gastroenterology and its impact on clinical practices. It highlights lessons learned regarding human–AI collaboration and effective use of technology.
  • Literature review on AI applications in gastroenterology
  • Examination of randomized controlled trials versus real-world studies
  • Analysis of human–AI collaboration dynamics based on interaction theories
  • AI tools improved adenoma detection rates in colonoscopy
  • Clinician acceptance and trust were identified as critical factors for successful AI integration
  • AI should be viewed as augmentative rather than a replacement for human expertise

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly emerging in gastroenterology, with early applications in colonoscopy polyp detection and characterization. Some lessons can be distilled, especially when systems shown to be helpful in randomized, controlled trials did not show similar benefits in pragmatic real-world studies. This article provides a review of available literature and examines the dynamics of human–AI collaboration in gastrointestinal (GI) practices. We outline how deep learning-based AI tools have demonstrated improved lesion detection (e.g., increasing adenoma detection rates in colonoscopy). At the same time, we highlight real-world lessons regarding clinician acceptance, trust, and partnering between gastroenterologists and AI leading to more positive outcomes. Drawing on Kate Darling’s, a robotics researcher at MIT, human–robot interaction theory, we discuss how anthropomorphism and the perceived moral agency of AI influence user trust and ethical considerations. Overall, the integration of AI in gastroenterology shows great promise when humans and machines work in tandem. Gastroenterologists’ experience to date reveals that AI is most effective as an augmentative “second pair of eyes” rather than an autonomous replacement and that successful adoption requires careful attention to human factors, training, and context. These early lessons will inform future deployments and ensure that AI innovations are harnessed to improve patient outcomes in an ethically responsible manner.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Farfour et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0aad5c5ba8ef6d83b70d2dhttps://doi.org/10.1177/2993091x261451041
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Optical Diagnosis: A Comprehensive Review of Its Role in Leave-In-Situ and Resect-and-Discard Strategies in Colonoscopy2023 · 22 citations
  2. 2Artificial intelligence and colonoscopy experience: lessons from two randomised trials2021 · 245 citations
  3. 3Artificial Intelligence–Assisted Colonoscopy in Real-World Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis2023 · 55 citations
  4. 4Artificial intelligence for polyp characterization: a challenging road ahead2021 · 1 citations
  5. 5Endoscopist deskilling risk after exposure to artificial intelligence in colonoscopy: a multicentre, observational study2025 · 248 citations