Key result
Health Technology Assessment programs must adapt methodologies to evaluate patient safety technologies.
Why the study?
Despite widespread investment in patient safety technologies, little Health Technology Assessment has been conducted to establish their clinical or cost-effectiveness.
This review highlights the critical need for Health Technology Assessment programs to systematically evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of patient safety technologies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
HTA programs may need updated prioritization for safety technologies; leaves open standardized clinical-economic evaluation frameworks.
Health Technology Assessment (HTA) is a process used to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and costeffectiveness of health technologies by a systematic review of clinical, economic, and utilization research. Despite widespread investment in patient safety technologies in the U.K., U.S., and elsewhere, little HTA has been done to establish the clinical or cost-effectiveness of these technologies. The HTA and patient safety literature suggests there are four categories of patient safety HTA, including HTA for existing safety technologies, underutilized safety technologies, emerging safety technologies, as well as safety aspects of technologies with a non-safety primary purpose. Recent HTA and other research, including a 2002 evidencebased evaluation of patient safety technologies from the U.S. Agency for Health Research and Quality, provide an important foundation for a more comprehensive approach to patient safety HTA. However, HTA programs must address prioritization, methodology, and dissemination challenges introduced by patient safety technologies before significant progress can Te made.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mulcahy et al. (2024) conducted a review in Patient safety. Health Technology Assessment (HTA) was evaluated. Health Technology Assessment programs must adapt their prioritization processes and methodologies to evaluate the clinical and economic effectiveness of patient safety technologies.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: