Key result
Pleomorphic liposarcoma shows ~54% overall survival, with surgery and radiotherapy linked to improved prognosis.
Why the study?
Very few studies have presented data on pleomorphic liposarcoma specifically, leaving its survivorship and prognostic characteristics incompletely identified.
Does cancer-directed surgery or radiotherapy improve survival in patients with pleomorphic liposarcoma?
Cross-Sectional
Does cancer-directed surgery or radiotherapy improve survival in patients with pleomorphic liposarcoma?
In patients with pleomorphic liposarcoma, cancer-directed surgery significantly improves survival, while radiotherapy provides survival benefits primarily for tumors larger than 10 cm.
BACKGROUND: Pleomorphic liposarcoma is the least common but most aggressive subtype of liposarcoma. Very few studies have presented data on pleomorphic liposarcoma specifically, often including a limited number of cases and short-term follow-up. As a result, the survivorship and prognostic characteristics of this tumor remain incompletely identified. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional analysis of the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database (1996-2015). RESULTS: Overall survival for the entire series was 54% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49-58%) and 40% (95% CI, 35-45%) at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Disease-specific survival for the entire series was 60% (95% CI, 56-65%) and 53% (95% CI, 48-58%) at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Patients who survived 10 years or more were more likely to die of events unrelated to pleomorphic liposarcoma. Univariate and multivariate analysis demonstrated that not receiving cancer-directed surgery was an independent poor prognostic factor. Older age (≥ 65 years old) was associated with worse overall survival but not disease-specific survival. Tumor stage and radiotherapy showed different impact on survival depending on tumor size. In comparison to localized staged tumors, regional stage only predicts poor survival in patients with tumor size less than 5 cm, while distant stage is an independent worse prognosis factor. Radiotherapy only benefits patients with tumor size larger than 10 cm. These results were confirmed in competing risk analysis. CONCLUSION: Survival rates of patients with pleomorphic liposarcoma has not changed over the past 20 years. Patients with distant stage have poor prognosis; regional stage indicates worse survival in patients with tumor size less than 5 cm. Receiving surgery could prolong the survival, while radiotherapy only benefits patients with large tumor size (> 10 cm). Older age is associated with poor overall survival but not disease-specific survival. Routine patient surveillance following initial diagnosis should at least be 10 years for pleomorphic liposarcoma.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wan et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Pleomorphic liposarcoma. Prognostic factors (surgery, radiotherapy) was evaluated on Overall survival at 5 years (95% CI 49-58). Pleomorphic liposarcoma demonstrated a 5-year overall survival of 54% (95% CI, 49-58%), with cancer-directed surgery and radiotherapy for tumors >10 cm acting as positive prognostic factors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: