OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility (interreviewer agreement) and repeatability (intrareviewer agreement) of ROI sampling strategies to measure chemical shift-encoded (CSE) MRI-based liver proton density fat fraction (PDFF) and R2* (1 / T2*). A secondary purpose was to standardize ROI-based liver PDFF and R2* measurements by providing a compromise between measurement reproducibility and repeatability and time burden for image analysts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: CSE data from two cohorts were retrospectively analyzed. Cohort A included 53 patients referred for abdominal MRI and healthy subjects recruited for a comparison study of CT and MRI. Cohort B included 37 patients with suspected liver iron overload. Three reviewers measured liver PDFF and R2* using previously reported ROI sampling strategies. Inter- and intrareviewer agreement of liver PDFF and R2* were evaluated using Bland-Altman analysis. RESULTS: for cohort B. This approach was the most time-burdensome, requiring a mean ± SD of 149.7 ± 8.6 s per dataset. CONCLUSION: For improved reproducibility and repeatability of liver PDFF and R2* measurements, clinicians and researchers should sample as much area of the liver as possible using multiple large ROIs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Campo et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: