In this paper, the microfauna distribution data of a contact stabilization process were used in a neural network system to model and predict the biological activity of the effluent. Five uncorrelated components of the microfauna were used as the artificial neural network model input to predict the dehydrogenase activity of the effluent (DAE) using back-propagation and general regression algorithms. The models’ optimum architectures were determined for the back-propagation neural network (BPNN) model by varying the number of hidden layers, hidden transfer functions, test set size percentages, and initial weights. Comparison of the two model prediction results showed that the genetic general regression neural network model demonstrated the ability to calibrate the multicomponent microfauna, and yielded reliable DAE close to that resulting from direct experimentation, and thus was judged superior to BPNN models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al-Mutairi et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: