Key result
An annual household income <$20,000 remained a significant independent predictor of cardiovascular death or MI (p=0.006) in risk-adjusted models for women with suspected myocardial ischemia.
Why the study?
Does low socioeconomic status (annual household income <$20,000) increase the risk of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction in women with suspected myocardial ischemia?
Cohort (n=819)
Does low socioeconomic status (annual household income <$20,000) increase the risk of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction in women with suspected myocardial ischemia?
In women with suspected myocardial ischemia, low household income is a powerful independent predictor of cardiovascular death or MI and is associated with higher healthcare costs and lower quality of life.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant socioeconomic screening in risk assessment for women with suspected ischemia; leaves open whether targeted interventions improve outcomes.
Background: For women, who are more likely to live in poverty, defining the clinical and economic impact of socioeconomic factors may aid in defining redistributive policies to improve healthcare quality. Methods. The NIH-NHLBI-sponsored Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation (WISE) enrolled 819 women referred for clinically indicated coronary angiography. This study's primary end point was to evaluate the independent contribution of socioeconomic factors on the estimation of time to cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction (MI) ( n = 79) using Cox proportional hazards models. Secondary aims included an examination of cardiovascular costs and quality of life within socioeconomic subsets of women. Results: In univariable models, socioeconomic factors associated with an elevated risk of cardiovascular death or MI included an annual household income <$20,000 ( p = 0.0001), <9th grade education ( p = 0.002), being African American, Hispanic, Asian, or American Indian ( p = 0.016), on Medicaid, Medicare, or other public health insurance ( p < 0.0001), unmarried ( p = 0.001), unemployed or employed part-time ( p < 0.0001), and working in a service job ( p = 0.003). Of these socioeconomic factors, income ( p = 0.006) remained a significant predictor of cardiovascular death or MI in risk-adjusted models that controlled for angiographic coronary disease, chest pain symptoms, and cardiac risk factors. Low-income women, with an annual household income <$20,000, were more often uninsured or on public insurance ( p < 0.0001) yet had the highest 5-year hospitalization and drug treatment costs ( p < 0.0001). Only 17% of low-income women had prescription drug coverage (vs. ≥50% of higher-income households, p < 0.0001), and 64% required ≥2 anti-ischemic medications during follow-up (compared with 45% of those earning ≥$50,000, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Economic disadvantage prominently affects cardiovascular disease outcomes for women with chest pain symptoms. These results further support a profound intertwining between poverty and poor health. Cardiovascular disease management strategies should focus on policies that track unmet healthcare needs and worsening clinical status for low-income women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shaw et al. (2008) conducted a cohort in Suspected myocardial ischemia (n=819). Low socioeconomic status (e.g., annual household income <$20,000) vs. Higher socioeconomic status was evaluated on Time to cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction (MI) (p=0.006). An annual household income <$20,000 remained a significant independent predictor of cardiovascular death or MI (p=0.006) in risk-adjusted models for women with suspected myocardial ischemia.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: