PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1976Circulation339 citations

Influence of acute changes in preload, afterload, contractile state and heart rate on ejection and isovolumic indices of myocardial contractility in man.

View Full Paper
MQMiguel A. QuiñonesWGWilliam H. GaaschJAJames Alexander

Key Points

  • To examine how changes in preload, afterload, and heart rate affect indices of myocardial contractility.
  • Studied 14 patients during cardiac catheterization with left ventricular pressure and ultrasound recordings.

Structured PICO

How do acute changes in preload, afterload, contractile state, and heart rate affect ejection and isovolumic indices of myocardial contractility in humans?

P
Population
14 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization with simultaneous recordings of left ventricular (LV) pressures and ultrasound dimensions
I
Intervention
Acute changes in preload (volume expansion), afterload (angiotensin), inotropic stimulation (isoproterenol), and heart rate (atrial pacing)
C
Comparator
Baseline state prior to acute hemodynamic changes
O
Outcome
Sensitivity of isovolumic and ejection phase indices of myocardial contractility (including VCF, max dP/dt, (dP/dt)/C, (dP/dt)/CP, peak VCE, Vmax, VCEDP10, and (dP/dt)/DP40)surrogate

Max dP/dt normalized for end-diastolic circumference is a stable and sensitive index for assessing acute changes in myocardial inotropic state, whereas VCE measurements are too sensitive to loading conditions.

Abstract

To determine the sensitivity of several isovolumic and ejection phase indices of myocardial contractility to loading, inotropic stimulation and heart rate in man, 14 patients (pts) were studied during cardiac catheterization with simultaneous recordings of left ventricular (LV) pressures and ultrasound dimensions. Measurements were made of instantaneous and mean circumferential fiber shortening velocity (VCF), maximal (max) rate of LV pressure rise (dP/dt), dPHdt divided by end-diastolic circumference (dP/dt)/C, (DP/dt)/C divided by aortic valve opening pressure (dP/dt/CP, PEAK CONTRACTILe element velocity (VCE) using total LV pressure, VCE extrapolated to zero total pressure (Vmax), VCE at a developed pressure of 10 mm Hg (VCEDP10) and dP/dt at a common isovolumic developed pressure of 40 mm Hg (dP/dt)/DP40. Resulta are expressed in per cent change of the mean for the group. Acute preload increase (8.6% increase in end-diastolic circumference) with volume expansion at constant heart rate in 7 pts produced insignificant changes in VSF, an 8.3% increase in max dP/dt, no change in (dP/dt)/C, a variable response in (dP/dt)/CP, 18% reduction in peak VCE, 16% reduction in Vmax, 14% increase in VCEDP10, and a 10% increase in (dP/dt)/DP40. An acute increase in afterload produced by angiotensin in 8 pts (44% increase in peak stress) led to a 38% decrease in VCF, a 2.5% increase in max dP/dt, no significant change in (dP/dt)/C, a 26% reduction in (dP/dt)/CP, variable responses in peak VCE and Vmax, an 11% increase in VCEDP10 and minor changes in (dP/dt)/DP40. All of the contractility indices were augmented significantly by isoproterenol and atrial pacing. In a given patient, max, dP/dt appears to be useful in the assessment of acute changes in inotropic state since the magnitude of its response to abrupt changes in preload is small and to afterload insignificant. Normalizing max dP/dt for end-diastolic circumference assures better stability during loading with good sensitivity to inotropic stimulation. VCF may be used whenever changes in afterload are minimal. The isovolumic measurements of VCE (regardless of whether total or developed pressure is used) lack sufficient stability during acute changes in loading conditions to warrant their use in the quantitative assessment of acute changes in inotropic state.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Quiñones et al. (1976) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0b990cd7f95f637495c9cahttps://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.53.2.293
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper