PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 1, 1976Circulation189 citationsOpen Access

Acute hemodynamic interventions shift the diastolic pressure-volume curve in man.

View Full Paper
EAEdwin L. AldermanSGStanton A. Glantz

Key Result

Acute hemodynamic interventions with angiotensin and nitroprusside produced substantial shifts in the diastolic pressure-volume curve in 16 patients, likely due to external mechanical constraints.

Key Points

  • This research examines how acute hemodynamic interventions alter the diastolic pressure-volume curve in humans.
  • Frame-by-frame analysis of angiograms in 16 patients.
  • Indirect pleural pressure measurements via esophageal pressure in 7 patients.
  • Theoretical analysis based on a validated pressure-volume equation from previous dog studies.
  • Angiotensin raised blood pressure, shifting the pressure-volume curve upward significantly.
  • Nitroprusside lowered blood pressure, resulting in a downward shift of the curve.
  • Observed shifts could not be attributed to changes in myocardial elasticity but were linked to external mechanical constraints.

Study Design

Type

Observational (n=16)

Structured PICO

Do acute hemodynamic interventions shift the diastolic pressure-volume curve in patients?

P
Population
16 patients undergoing angiograms (7 with indirect pleural pressure measurements via esophageal pressure)
I
Intervention
Acute hemodynamic interventions (angiotensin and nitroprusside)
O
Outcome
Shifts in the diastolic pressure-volume curvesurrogate

Acute hemodynamic interventions shift the diastolic pressure-volume curve, demonstrating that end-diastolic pressure cannot be used interchangeably with end-diastolic volume when interpreting the Frank-Starling mechanism.

Abstract

Frame-by-frame analysis of angiograms in 16 patients revealed that hemodynamic interventions are capable of producing substantial shifts in the diastolic pressure-volume curve. Angiotensin raises blood pressure and shifts the entire pressure-volume curve up, and nitroprusside lowers blood pressure and shifts the curve down. Indirect measurements of pleural pressure in seven patients (via esophageal pressure) showed that pleural pressure changes were too small to account for these shifts. Analyzing our results in terms of a theoretical pressure-volume equation previously validated in dog studies did not show the observed shifts to be the product of acute changes in the elasticity of the myocardium itself. This same analysis suggested that indirect changes in the external mechanical constraints acting on the left ventricle such as the right ventricular pressure, the pericardium, and perhaps viscoelastic effects related to changes in filling rate account for the pressure-volume curve shifts with intervention. The fact that one cannot in general relate a specific volume to a given pressure in the face of hemodynamic interventions calls into question the use of end-diastolic pressure interchangeably with end-diastolic fiber length when interpreting systolic events in terms of the Frank-Starling mechanism.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alderman et al. (1976) reported an observational. Hemodynamic interventions (angiotensin, nitroprusside) was evaluated on Diastolic pressure-volume curve shifts. Acute hemodynamic interventions with angiotensin and nitroprusside produced substantial shifts in the diastolic pressure-volume curve in 16 patients, likely due to external mechanical constraints.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0b9ced29a6fde3ef95d428https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.54.4.662
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper