Key result
CT and MRI consistently support ED diagnosis of suspected ACS and myocardial damage.
Why the study?
The potential fatal consequences and malpractice costs of missed acute coronary syndromes cause unnecessary hospital admissions, while CT and MRI have significantly changed chest pain evaluation.
Does the use of CT and MRI improve the diagnostic workflow in patients presenting with non-traumatic chest pain to the Emergency Department?
Does the use of CT and MRI improve the diagnostic workflow in patients presenting with non-traumatic chest pain to the Emergency Department?
CT and MRI are essential imaging modalities that enhance the diagnostic workflow for patients presenting with non-traumatic chest pain in the emergency setting.
May support CT/MRI in ED chest pain workflows; leaves open need for prospective outcome trials.
Current strategies for the evaluation of patients with chest pain have significantly changed thanks to the implemented potentiality of CT and MRI. The possible fatal consequences and high malpractice costs of missed acute coronary syndromes lead to unnecessary hospital admissions every year. CT provides consistent diagnostic support, mainly in suspected coronary disease in patients with a low or intermediate pre-test risk. Moreover, it can gain information in the case of cardiac involvement in pulmonary vascular obstructive disease. MRI, on the other hand, has a leading role in the condition of myocardial damage irrespective of the underlying inflammatory or stress related etiology. This article discusses how radiology techniques (CT and MRI) can impact the diagnostic workflow of the most common cardiac and vascular pathologies that are responsible for non-traumatic chest pain admissions to the Emergency Department.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liguori et al. (2022) conducted a review in Cardiac emergencies and non-traumatic chest pain. CT and MRI was evaluated. CT and MRI provide consistent diagnostic support in evaluating patients with non-traumatic chest pain and suspected acute coronary syndromes or myocardial damage in the Emergency Department.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: