Key result
Rivaroxaban increases major bleeding risk ~170% vs aspirin after recent embolic stroke.
Why the study?
Risks, sites, and predictors of major bleeding during antithrombotic therapies had not been well defined for patients with recent embolic stroke of undetermined source.
Does rivaroxaban compared to aspirin increase major bleeding in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source, and what are the predictors of bleeding?
RCT (n=7,213)
Yes
Does rivaroxaban compared to aspirin increase major bleeding in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source, and what are the predictors of bleeding?
In patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source, rivaroxaban, East Asian region, elevated systolic blood pressure, and impaired renal function are independent predictors of major bleeding.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May warrant bleeding caution with rivaroxaban in recent embolic stroke; leaves open randomized validation of predictors.
Background and Purpose: Risks, sites, and predictors of major bleeding during antithrombotic therapies have not been well defined for patients with recent embolic stroke of undetermined source. Methods: Exploratory analysis of major bleeds defined by International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis criteria occurring among 7213 participants in international NAVIGATE (New Approach Rivaroxaban Inhibition of Factor Xa in a Global Trial) embolic stroke of undetermined source randomized trial comparing rivaroxaban 15 mg daily with aspirin 100 mg daily. Results: During a median follow-up of 11 months, 85 major bleeds occurred. The most frequent site was gastrointestinal (38%), followed by intracranial (29%). Assignment to rivaroxaban (hazard ratio [HR], 2.7 [95% CI, 1.7–4.3]), East Asia region (HR, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.6–3.9]), systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg (HR, 2.2 [95% CI, 1.2–3.8]), and reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (HR, 1.2 per 10 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 decrease, [95% CI, 1.0–1.3]) were independently associated with presence of major bleeds. Five (6%) were fatal. Among 15 patients with intracerebral hemorrhage, 2 (13%) were fatal. There was no evidence of an early high-risk period following initiation of rivaroxaban. The annualized rate of intracerebral hemorrhage was 6-fold higher among East Asian participants (0.67%) versus all other regions (0.11%; HR, 6.3 [95% CI, 2.2–18.0]). Distribution of bleeding sites was similar for rivaroxaban and aspirin. Conclusions: Among embolic stroke of undetermined source patients participating in an international randomized trial, independent predictors of major bleeding were assignment to rivaroxaban, East Asia region, increased systolic blood pressure, and impaired renal function. East Asia as a region was strongly associated with risk of intracerebral hemorrhage. Estimated glomerular filtration rate should be a consideration for stratifying bleeding risk. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02313909.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mikulík et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in embolic stroke of undetermined source (n=7,213). rivaroxaban vs. aspirin 100 mg daily was evaluated on major bleeds defined by International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis criteria (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.7-4.3). Assignment to rivaroxaban 15 mg daily was independently associated with an increased risk of major bleeding compared to aspirin (HR 2.7; 95% CI 1.7-4.3) in patients with recent embolic stroke.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: