Key result
Cardiovascular autonomic tests identify syncope or orthostatic intolerance etiology in ~92% of paced patients.
Why the study?
Syncope and orthostatic intolerance in paced patients represent a common clinical dilemma, prompting investigation into their underlying aetiology.
Does cardiovascular autonomic testing identify the etiology of unexplained syncope and/or orthostatic intolerance in paced patients?
Observational (n=39)
Does cardiovascular autonomic testing identify the etiology of unexplained syncope and/or orthostatic intolerance in paced patients?
Cardiovascular autonomic tests can identify the etiology of syncope in the vast majority of paced patients, with orthostatic hypotension and vasovagal syncope being the most common causes rather than device dysfunction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports autonomic testing to identify orthostatic or vasovagal causes in paced patients with unexplained syncope; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Introduction: Syncope and orthostatic intolerance in paced patients constitute a common clinical dilemma. We, thus, aimed to determine the aetiology of syncope and/or symptoms of orthostatic intolerance in paced patients. Methods: Among 1705 patients with unexplained syncope and/or orthostatic intolerance that were investigated by cardiovascular autonomic tests, including Valsalva manoeuvre, active standing, carotid sinus massage, and tilt-testing, 39 patients (2.3 %; age 65.6 years; 39 % women) had a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED). We explored past medical history, diagnoses found during cardiovascular autonomic tests, and the further clinical workup, in case of negative initial evaluation. Results: An aetiology was identified during cardiovascular autonomic tests in 36 of the 39 patients. Orthostatic hypotension (n=16; 41%) and vasovagal syncope (n=12; 31%) were the most common diagnoses. There were no cases of pacemaker dysfunction. The original pacing indications followed guidelines (sick-sinus-syndrome in 16, atrioventricular block in 16, atrial fibrillation with bradycardia in five). Twenty-two of the 39 patients (56 %) had experienced syncope prior to the original CIED implantation. Orthostatic hypotension was diagnosed in seven (32%) and vasovagal syncope in nine (41%) of these patients. Of the 17 patients that had not experienced syncope prior to the original CIED implantation, nine patients (53 %) were diagnosed with orthostatic hypotension and vasovagal syncope was diagnosed in three (18%). Of the 39 patients, two had implantable cardioverter-defibrillators to treat malignant ventricular arrhythmias diagnosed after syncopal episodes. Conclusion: Cardiovascular autonomic tests reveal the aetiology of syncope and/or orthostatic intolerance in the majority of paced patients. The most common diagnosis was orthostatic hypotension (40 %) followed by vasovagal syncope (30%), whereas there were no cases of pacemaker dysfunction. Our results emphasize the importance of a complete diagnostic work-up, including cardiovascular autonomic tests, in paced patients that present with syncope and/or orthostatic intolerance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yasa et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Unexplained syncope and/or orthostatic intolerance in paced patients (n=39). Cardiovascular autonomic tests was evaluated on Aetiology of syncope and/or symptoms of orthostatic intolerance. Cardiovascular autonomic tests identified the etiology of syncope or orthostatic intolerance in 36 of 39 paced patients, most commonly orthostatic hypotension (41%) and vasovagal syncope (31%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: