Key result
Review highlights evidence gaps for revascularization versus medical therapy in stable CAD prompting the ISCHEMIA trial.
Why the study?
It was relevant to highlight the strengths, limitations, and knowledge gaps in existing evidence on revascularization that motivated the ISCHEMIA trial in patients with stable coronary artery disease.
Does angiography and revascularization improve outcomes compared to medical therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease?
Does angiography and revascularization improve outcomes compared to medical therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease?
This review discusses the historical context and impact of the ISCHEMIA trial on indications for revascularization in stable coronary artery disease.
Evidence gaps in pre-ISCHEMIA trials support cautious revascularization decisions in stable CAD; leaves open optimal strategies pending updated evidence.
Trials of the indications for revascularization have a long history dating back to the publication of the Veterans Affairs (VA) cooperative study of surgical vs. medical therapy for left main coronary disease.5 Since that time, a considerable body of evidence has been acquired, albeit far from perfect, but notwithstanding, this has been the basis for most of our societal guidelines on the management of stable angina. Nonetheless, it is relevant to highlight the strengths and the limitations of what evidence we have and to clarify the gaps in our knowledge base that were the impetus and, in fact, the rationale for the ISCHEMIA trial. The early trials of coronary bypass surgery vs. medical therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease had major limitations in terms of their relatively small sample size, lack of use of the internal mammary artery in the majority, and all...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gersh et al. (2021) conducted a review in stable coronary artery disease. Revascularization vs. Medical therapy was evaluated. This review discusses the historical evidence for revascularization versus medical therapy in stable coronary artery disease, highlighting the gaps that provided the rationale for the ISCHEMIA trial.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: