Retrospective observational study finds improved outcomes in patients treated with ELX/TEZ/IVA vs. ineligible individuals, indicating treatment effectiveness during COVID-19.
The initial US launch of elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ELX/TEZ/IVA) coincided with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, altering healthcare-seeking behaviors and possibly resulting in decreased respiratory infection transmission. We evaluated real-world effectiveness of ELX/TEZ/IVA, accounting for potential impact of COVID-19 by comparing outcomes in people with cystic fibrosis (CF) treated with ELX/TEZ/IVA with ELX/TEZ/IVA-ineligible people with CF. This retrospective, observational study used US CF Foundation Patient Registry data (2017–2021) of people with CF aged ≥ 12 years initiating ELX/TEZ/IVA between Q4 2019 and Q3 2021 and a concurrent comparator cohort ineligible for ELX/TEZ/IVA. Primary outcomes (follow-up through 2021 or death) included change in percent predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s (ppFEV1) from baseline over follow-up, annualized rate of ppFEV1 decline, rate of pulmonary exacerbations (PEx), time to lung transplantation, and overall survival. ppFEV1 increased in ELX/TEZ/IVA-treated individuals through follow-up but decreased in the comparator cohort (+6.20 versus −3.13 percentage points, respectively; mean difference 9.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.84 to 9.85). The annualized rate of ppFEV1 change was −0.03 (95% CI −0.18 to 0.07) in the ELX/TEZ/IVA-treated cohort and −2.24 (95% CI −2.66 to −1.80) in the comparator cohort (relative reduction in rate of decline of 99%; 95% CI 92–103%). Rates of PEx requiring intravenous antibiotics or hospitalization were 0.17 and 0.77 among ELX/TEZ/IVA-treated and comparator cohorts, respectively (77% reduction, 95% CI 74–81%). Proportion undergoing lung transplant was 0.22% and 2.94% in ELX/TEZ/IVA-treated and comparator cohorts, respectively (90% reduction, 95% CI 29–98%). All-cause mortality was 0.76% and 3.45% in ELX/TEZ/IVA-treated and comparator cohorts, respectively (79% reduction; 95% CI 56–88%). During COVID-19, ELX/TEZ/IVA-ineligible people with CF experienced lung function decline and higher rates of PEx, lung transplant, and death versus the ELX/TEZ/IVA-treated cohort, despite infection prevention measures, suggesting ELX/TEZ/IVA’s benefits remain despite the potential bias from protective effects of the pandemic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Merlo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: