Analysis reveals how strategic ignorance distorts evidence incorporation in Japan's policy decisions, suggesting systemic implications.
Applying Linsey McGoey's strategic ignorance theory to Japan's EBPM promotion, this analysis examines the structural mechanisms by which evidence is not reflected in policy despite its existence. It reveals the structure of intentional ignorance behind rhetoric such as 'insufficient data' and 'still too early.'
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Naoya Yokota (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: