PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 19, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Breathing Universe: 208TTechnical Addendum to Horizon-Scale Regulation of Vacuum Energy

View Full Paper
ICIvo Gerlach Angela Noel Cerfontaine

Key Points

  • This work examines the cosmological constant problem by proposing a new framework that views vacuum energy as emerging from large-scale balancing within coherence domains.
  • Develops a phenomenological extension of the Breathing Universe framework.
  • Introduces scaling relations and stochastic relaxation dynamics to model vacuum contributions.
  • Utilizes statistical averaging and coarse-grained order parameters to derive effective field theories.
  • Establishes the relation Λ_BUM = ξ R_H^(-2), predicting a suppression consistent with observed cosmological hierarchy.
  • Demonstrates that residual imbalance leads to an effective cosmological curvature contribution.
  • Maintains compatibility with ΛCDM at leading order while proposing testable deviations.

Abstract

The cosmological constant problem remains one of the largest unresolved hierarchy problems in modern theoretical physics. Conventional quantum field theoretic estimates of vacuum energy exceed the observed cosmological vacuum curvature by approximately 122 orders of magnitude when expressed in Planck units. The present work develops a technical phenomenological extension of the Breathing Universe (BUM) framework and explores an alternative interpretation in which the observed cosmological constant emerges not from direct summation of microscopic vacuum contributions, but from incomplete large-scale balancing across finite coherence domains. The framework models the vacuum as a structured coherence medium characterized by complementary redistribution tendencies represented by H+ and H−. Their residual imbalance is defined through the relation H = H+ − H−, where H acts as a coarse-grained order parameter describing departures from approximate zero-line balance. Rather than interpreting H as a fundamental microscopic field, the framework treats it as an emergent large-scale collective variable arising after statistical averaging over unresolved vacuum structure. Within finite coherence regions, balancing drives the system toward the approximate condition H ≈ 0. However, because coherence balancing remains finite, stochastic, and horizon-limited, exact global cancellation cannot occur across the observable universe. Residual imbalance therefore survives after large-scale averaging and generates an effective cosmological vacuum curvature contribution. The central scaling relation developed throughout the framework is: ΛBUM = ξ RH^ (-2) where RH denotes the cosmological horizon scale and ξ characterizes the efficiency of incomplete horizon-limited balancing. Expressed in Planck units: ΛBUM lP² = ξ (lP/RH) ² Since RH/lP ~ 10⁶1, the resulting suppression naturally produces: Λ lP² ~ 10^ (-122) consistent with the observed cosmological hierarchy. To organize these ideas mathematically, the framework introduces stochastic relaxation dynamics, coarse-grained order-parameter descriptions, statistical averaging derivations, entropy-based suppression arguments, and candidate effective field formulations. Langevin-type relaxation equations are developed as phenomenological infrared descriptions incorporating balancing, diffusion, and residual fluctuations. The present work does not claim a completed microscopic derivation or quantum-gravitational theory. Instead, it establishes a mathematically disciplined technical addendum intended to stabilize conceptual assumptions, clarify interpretive boundaries, and provide a structured foundation for future effective field-theoretic and observational implementations. The framework remains compatible with ΛCDM at leading order while generating a set of potentially testable deviations involving horizon scaling, stochastic residual structure, and weak cosmological evolution of vacuum organization.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ivo Gerlach Angela Noel Cerfontaine (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0bfe2d166b51b53d37966bhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20262265
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper