Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Policy review reveals complexities in pro-poor land governance discourses across global institutions, highlighting ideological tensions in land administration.
The meaning of land and land policies is diverse and contested across and within local and (inter)national settings. The phrase ‘land policy’, used to refer to all policies that have anything to do with land, may be convenient, but it masks the actual complexity of issues. Meanwhile, concern for ‘pro‐poor’ land policy has coincided with the mainstream promotion of efficient administration of land policies, leading to the concept of ‘land governance’. Such concepts have enriched discussion on land issues, but they also complicate further an already complex terrain. In response, this paper offers possible analytical signposts, rather than an actual in‐depth and elaborated analytical exploration of this terrain. It hopes to be a modest step forward and towards a better understanding of contemporary policy discourses and political contestations around land and land governance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borras et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: