This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
• Initiatives for development and social justice ought to include initiatives and struggles to democratize knowledge politics. • Scholar-activism takes the side of the exploited and the oppressed when talking about development, and it is embedded in the wideranging knowledge political coalitions. • It is important to critically examine questions as to who gets to talk about development, from which platform and how, whose voices count, and the conditions under which various actors talk about development. Scholar-activism is a tradition in knowledge politics that takes the side of the exploited and the oppressed when talking about development. It is necessarily embedded in the wideranging knowledge political coalitions – for social justice or corporate profit-making – that include actors from academia, grassroots social movements, small autonomous research institutions, as well as states, corporations and philanthropies. We critically examine questions as to who gets to talk about development, from which platform and how, whose voices count, and the conditions under which various actors talk about development.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Borras et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: