Key result
Sacubitril/valsartan in HFrEF yields similar NT-proBNP and LVEF improvements for SBP below versus above 100.
Why the study?
It was unclear whether sacubitril/valsartan is beneficial for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and low systolic blood pressure.
Does sacubitril/valsartan safely improve NT-proBNP and LVEF in HFrEF patients with asymptomatic hypotension (SBP < 100 mmHg) compared to those with higher baseline blood pressure?
Observational (n=117)
Does sacubitril/valsartan safely improve NT-proBNP and LVEF in HFrEF patients with asymptomatic hypotension (SBP < 100 mmHg) compared to those with higher baseline blood pressure?
Absolute Event Rate: 1627.5% vs 1340.1%
p-value: p=0.75
Sacubitril/valsartan is well-tolerated and effective at inducing reverse remodeling in HFrEF patients with asymptomatic hypotension (SBP < 100 mmHg), demonstrating similar benefits to those seen in patients with higher baseline blood pressure.
May support sacubitril/valsartan in asymptomatic low-SBP HFrEF; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND It is not clear whether sacubitril/valsartan is beneficial for patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and low systolic blood pressure (SBP). This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and tolerability of sacubitril/valsartan in HFrEF patients with SBP < 100 mmHg. METHODS & RESULTS An observational study was conducted on 117 patients, 40.2% of whom had SBP < 100 mmHg without symptomatic hypotension, and 59.8% of whom had SBP ≥ 100 mmHg in an optimized HF follow-up management system. At the 6-month follow-up, 52.4% of patients with SBP < 100 mmHg and 70.0% of those with SBP ≥ 100 mmHg successfully reached the target dosages of sacubitril/valsartan. A reduction in the concentration of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide was similar between patients with SBP < 100 mmHg and SBP ≥ 100 mmHg (1627.5 pg/mL and 1340.1 pg/mL, respectively; P = 0.75). The effect of sacubitril/valsartan on left ventricular ejection fraction was observed in both SBP categories, with a 10.8% increase in patients with SBP < 100 mmHg (P < 0.001) and a 14.0% increase in patients with SBP ≥ 100 mmHg (P < 0.001). The effects of sacubitril/valsartan on SBP were statistically significant and inverse across both SBP categories (P = 0.001), with an increase of 7.5 mmHg in patients with SBP < 100 mmHg and a decrease of 11.5 mmHg in patients with SBP ≥ 100 mmHg. No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of the occurrence of symptomatic hypotension, deteriorating renal function, hyperkalemia, angioedema, or stroke. CONCLUSIONS Within an optimized HF follow-up management system, sacubitril/valsartan exhibited excellent tolerability and prompted left ventricular reverse remodeling in patients with HFrEF who presented asymptomatic hypotension.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) (n=117). Sacubitril/valsartan vs. Patients with SBP ≥ 100 mmHg was evaluated on Reduction in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentration (p=0.75). Sacubitril/valsartan in HFrEF patients with SBP < 100 mmHg yielded similar NT-proBNP reductions (1627.5 vs 1340.1 pg/mL; P=0.75) and LVEF improvements compared to patients with SBP ≥ 100 mmHg.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: