PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 15, 2000Journal of Clinical Oncology360 citations

Synovial Sarcoma: A Clinicopathologic, Staging, and Prognostic Assessment

View Full Paper
ASAndrew J. SpillaneRARoger A’HernIJIan Judson

Key Result

Tumor size trend and local recurrence were significant prognostic indicators for survival (P<0.001) in patients with synovial sarcoma, who demonstrated an overall 5-year survival rate of 57%.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=150)

Structured PICO

What are the clinicopathologic, staging, and prognostic factors for survival in patients with synovial sarcoma?

P
Population
150 patients with synovial sarcoma (SS), median age 30 years
I
Intervention
Chemotherapy (including ifosfamide and doxorubicin) and pulmonary metastasectomy in subsets of patients
O
Outcome
Overall actuarial 5-year survival ratehard clinical

Synovial sarcoma primarily affects young adults and has an overall 5-year survival of 57%, with tumor size trend, age >20, and local recurrence being significant prognostic factors.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a common soft tissue sarcoma (STS) with a propensity for young adults and notable sensitivity to chemotherapy (CT). This study provides a current clinicopathologic, staging, and prognostic assessment for SS. The problems with the current American Joint Committee for Cancer (AJCC) Staging System in relation to SS are discussed. METHODS: Review of a prospective database supplemented by retrospective data. RESULTS: One hundred fifty patients were assessed; median age was 30 years and median follow-up was 52 months. Overall actuarial 5-year survival rate was 57%. Size trend, but not a cutoff of less than 5 cm versus > or = 5 cm, was a prognostic indicator (P <.001). The current AJCC/International Union Against Cancer Staging System differentiated prognosis less well than the recently proposed Royal Marsden Hospital Staging System. Age greater than 20 years at diagnosis implied worse prognosis. A local recurrence event was associated with a worse survival (P <.001). Therapeutic CT was administered to 55 patients. Eleven of 19 patients had an objective response to a combination of ifosfamide and doxorubicin. Four cases had complete response after CT. Twenty-one patients had pulmonary metastasectomy, with an actuarial 5-year survival rate of 23%. CONCLUSION: SS tends to affect young people. In this subtype of STS, size trend is the most significant influence on stage and hence survival; however, smaller SSs have an unexpectedly poor prognosis. Adequate local control may affect survival. SS is often chemosensitive, and given its poor prognosis, multicenter trials of adjuvant therapy are warranted.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Spillane et al. (2000) conducted a cohort in Synovial sarcoma (n=150). Tumor size trend and local recurrence were significant prognostic indicators for survival (P<0.001) in patients with synovial sarcoma, who demonstrated an overall 5-year survival rate of 57%.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0c7130e28175e95a2354dchttps://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2000.18.22.3794
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Synovial sarcoma: prognostic significance of tumor size, margin of resection, and mitotic activity for survival.1996 · 209 citations
  2. 2Histologic features relating to prognosis in synovial sarcoma1987 · 111 citations
  3. 3Poorly Differentiated Synovial Sarcoma1999 · 215 citations
  4. 4Synovial sarcoma.An Analysis of 134 Tumors1965 · 439 citations
  5. 5Functional compartmental resection for soft tissue sarcomas.1994 · 35 citations