Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Interpretations of the emergence of the New Public Management are split. The champions of the movement present it as a new administrative paradigm that departs sharply from past thinking and practice, whereas skeptics argue it has evolved incrementally from past administrative traditions. To assess these views, this article examines recent administrative innovations in the human services that broadly reflect the New Public Management. The findings suggest that these innovations have built incrementally on past reforms in the human services field, supporting the skeptics' claim that the New Public Management represents an evolution and renewal of historical trends in public administration.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stephen Page (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: