Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term radiological, clinical, and functional result of the intramedullary nailing in intra-articular distal tibia fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective clinical study. SETTING: Level II Trauma Hospital. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Between December 2000 and December 2006, 185 consecutive intra-articular distal tibia fractures were admitted in our institution. Fifty fractures were included in the study. According to the OTA classification, there were 28 (56%) fractures type 43 C1 and 22 (44%) type 43 C2. INTERVENTION: All fractures were treated with closed static intramedullary nailing with distal locking. In 37 (74%) patients, reduction of the articular extension of the fracture with additional internal fixation preceded the nailing. Fibula fixation was applied in 32 (64%) fractures. Routine dynamization of the fixation was performed in all cases at a mean time of 10 weeks postoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The mean follow-up was 42 months (range: 36-54 months). Leg length, tibia alignment, articular reduction, and ankle arthrosis were assessed radiographically. The clinical outcome was assessed using the Olerud-Molander score. The functional limitation was assessed using the musculoskeletal functional assessment. RESULTS: All fractures healed at an average of 16.3 weeks (range: 14-28 weeks). Anatomic reduction of the articular surface was obtained in all fractures. The average coronal plane deformity was 0.74 degree (range: 0-4 degrees) and the average sagittal plane deformity was 0.62 degree (range, 0-4 degrees). The mean Olerud-Molander score was 92.8/100 (range: 80-100). The average short musculoskeletal function assessment score was 34.55 ± 31.88 (range: 0.8-96). CONCLUSIONS: Intramedullary nailing augmented with minimal internal fixation is a safe alternative for the treatment of distal tibial fractures with a simple articular extension. Because all objectives of the treatment were obtained, the results did not deteriorate over time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level IV. See instructions for authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katsenis et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: