Key result
ESSR guideline implementation is linked to better MRI sequence use but not overall report quality.
Why the study?
It was unknown whether the implementation of the 2015 ESSR guidelines improved MRI protocol and report quality in patients with soft tissue sarcomas.
Does implementation of the 2015 ESSR guidelines improve MRI protocol and report quality in patients with soft tissue sarcomas?
Observational (n=103)
No
Does implementation of the 2015 ESSR guidelines improve MRI protocol and report quality in patients with soft tissue sarcomas?
The introduction of the 2015 ESSR guidelines did not consistently improve MRI quality or reporting for soft tissue sarcomas, highlighting a gap in guideline adherence.
ESSR guideline adoption alone may not improve MRI report quality; leaves open need for adherence strategies and prospective trials.
Soft tissue sarcomas are malignant diseases with a complex classification and various histological subtypes, mostly clinically inconspicuous appearance, and a rare occurrence. To ensure safe patient care, the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) issued a guideline for diagnostic imaging of soft tissue tumors in adults in 2015. In this study, we investigated whether implementation of these guidelines resulted in improved MRI protocol and report quality in patients with soft tissue sarcomas in our cancer center. All cases of histologically confirmed soft tissue sarcomas that were treated at our study center from 2006 to 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. The radiological reports were examined for their compliance with the recommendations of the ESSR. Patients were divided into two groups, before and after the introduction of the 2015 ESSR guidelines. In total, 103 cases of histologically confirmed sarcomas were studied. The distribution of, age, gender, number of subjects, performing radiology, and MRI indication on both groups did not show any significant differences. Only using the required MRI sequences showed a significant improvement after the introduction of the guidelines (p = 0.048). All other criteria, especially the requirements for the report of findings, showed no improvement. The guidelines of the European Society for Musculoskeletal Radiology are not regularly followed, and their establishment did not consistently improve MRI quality in our study group. This poses a risk for incorrect or delayed diagnosis and, ultimately, therapy of soft tissue tumors. However, this study is the first of its kind and involves a limited collective. A European-wide multicenter study would be appreciated to confirm these results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Korthaus et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Soft tissue sarcomas (n=103). 2015 ESSR guidelines for diagnostic imaging vs. Before the introduction of the 2015 ESSR guidelines was evaluated on Compliance with the recommendations of the ESSR (MRI protocol and report quality) (p=0.048). Implementation of the 2015 ESSR guidelines for soft tissue tumor imaging only significantly improved the use of required MRI sequences (p=0.048), without improving overall report quality.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: