Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Life cycle assessment reveals ecosystem-dependent carbon impacts of wind farms, indicating forest installations significantly elevate emissions compared to grassland and desert sites.
Wind energy plays a vital role in meeting rising electricity demand and climate goals, but its land-use footprints from vegetation removal, construction, and road sprawl may overestimate greenhouse gas (GHG) mitigation benefits. Here we used life cycle assessment (LCA) to explore the land-use impacts on GHG emissions and energy performance for three typical wind farms located in forest, grassland and desert ecosystems. We incorporated vegetation/soil removal during the installation stage, and the loss of additional carbon sink capacity during the operation and maintenance stage. Land-use change (LUC) contributed 37.9% of the life cycle emissions for the forest farm, while much lower for the grassland and desert farm (4.3% and 1.2%, respectively). Grassland deployment offered a triple win with highest energy return, lowest land-use intensity, and lowest GHG emissions. With mitigation measures, all farms achieved low emission intensity (below 5 g CO2-eq kWh−1), greatly reducing land-use and ecosystem-based emission intensity differences. In China, land-use emissions account for 38 percent of the lifecycle carbon footprint for wind farms in forest ecosystems, but only 4 percent for grasslands and 1 percent for deserts, according to a life cycle assessment method that incorporates ecosystem carbon losses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: