Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The reactivity of 4-nitrobenzofuroxan (NBF, 1) with several aryloxide nucleophiles has been monitored by 400 MHz 1H NMR spectroscopy in acetonitrile–glyme (CD3CN–[2H10] glyme. 1 : 1, v/v) at reduced temperatures and in dimethyl sulfoxide ([2H6] DMSO) at ambient temperature. With the ambident (O- and C-) nucleophile phenoxide ion, formation of a C-7 O-adduct (3b) is observed in CD3CN–[2H10]glyme at –40 °C. As the temperature is raised this adduct gives way to 7-hydroxy-4-nitrobenzofurazan (as the anion, 5) and a 7-phenoxynitronate derivative (4b) that arises from transfer of the sp3-bound proton (7-H) of the C-7 phenoxide O-adduct to the N-oxide function. These decomposition products are the sole species observed when the reaction is carried out in [2H6] DMSO. Thus in contrast to the reaction of 1 with methoxide ion, where the C-5 adduct (2a) is kinetically preferred while the C-7 adduct (3a) is thermodynamically more stable, no C-5 O-adduct of phenoxide is observed in the present system. In addition, C-adducts that could potentially arise from the ambident nature of phenoxide were not formed. A similar reaction sequence was found for the reaction of 1 with 3,5-di-tert-butylphenoxide ion and 2,4,6-trimethylphenoxide ion. However, C-attachment was observed in the reaction of 1 with 2,6-di-tert-butylphenoxide ion where O-attack is sterically blocked and, again, preference for C-7 attachment was found. Comparison is drawn between the present results concerning the reactivity of 1 with aryloxide nucleophiles and the reactivity displayed by methoxide ion. Stereoelectronic factors in the C-7 aryloxide O-adducts are also discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Manderville et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: